[NEAC GolfLeague] Controversy
Steve Dickson
steved at DicksonNet.net
Wed Jun 26 07:13:20 CDT 2013
On 06/25/2013 10:11 PM, Julewitz, Alex wrote:
> I can't believe anyone would in any way criticize anyone for making a
> choice of safety over play. Some may be more daring than others, but
> hells bells - lightning? Heavy downpour? Let's get real and remember
> why we're playing this game in the first place.
Well said... This is why I thought it made sense just to redo the entire
round,
but due to underlying circumstances that was not the case...
>
> That being said we should agree on some policy when things like this
> come up. Gary's suggestion of 5 holes played counting for score seems
> reasonable to me and I suggest we adopt that. For those foursomes
> that didn't finish 5 holes, my suggestion is that they conclude the
> match before the end of the flight or agree to a split out of the 3
> points based on holes played w/ no impact on quotas.
>
Yeah the 5 hole rule probably makes sense, but its a huge disadvantage
to the
higher quota guys... But it is what it is... playing in the rain is not
fun for
anybody...
steved.
More information about the golf-list
mailing list